A new intensity‐scale approach for the verification of spatial precipitation forecasts

By Barbara Casati, G. Ross, David B. Stephenson. 2004

228 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Atmospheric Science, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/3316f017e705926f9d9d6ec9e642e295d30d5eef

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Atmospheric Science

1. Elizabeth E. Ebert
2. Barbara Casati
3. Bjorn Stevens
4. Kazuo Saito
5. L. Duc
6. Hiromu Seko
7. B. Brown
8. Johannes Quaas

In Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition

1. Elizabeth E. Ebert
2. L. Duc
3. Kazuo Saito
4. Hiromu Seko
5. Hans-Christian Hege
6. B. Brown
7. Barbara Casati

Citations in the corpus

• Forecast verification: current status and future directions (2008, methodology): “technique (Casati et al., 2004), and the circular continuous rank probability score (Grimit, 2006).”
• SAL—A Novel Quality Measure for the Verification of Quantitative Precipitation Forecasts (2008, methodology): “First statistical investigations indicate an improved prediction of larger accumulations when using convection-resolving models compared to coarserscale models with parameterized convection (Mittermaier 2006, using the technique introduced by Casati et al. 2004).”
• Fuzzy verification of high‐resolution gridded forecasts: a review and proposed framework (2008, methodology): “This case was chosen because it has been examined in detail by Casati et al. (2004; their case 3); readers are referred to this article for the details of the event and to Golding (2000) for further details of the Nimrod system.”
• Convection‐permitting models: a step‐change in rainfall forecasting (2016, methodology): “Examples are the wavelet approach of Casati et al. (2004), or the ‘fuzzy’ approach using the Fractions Skill Score (FSS) (Roberts, 2008; Roberts and Lean, 2008), or an image morphing technique (Keil and Craig, 2009).”
• Spatial-temporal fractions verification for high-resolution ensemble forecasts (2013, methodology): “Some promising methods are listed here: Contiguous Rain Area (CRA; Ebert and McBride, 2000), Intensity Scale (Casati et al., 2004), Method for Object-based Diagnostic Evaluation (MODE; Davis et al., 2006), FSS (Roberts and Lean, 2008), Structure, Amplitude and Location (SAL; Wernli et al., 2008),…”
• Large‐eddy simulations over Germany using ICON: a comprehensive evaluation (2017, methodology): “The Intensity Scale Skill score (ISS) technique (Casati et al., 2004; Casati and Wilson, 2007; Casati, 2010) is used to evaluate the location of daily accumulated precipitation in the models on this day.”