Emerald Article: Intellectual capital research: a critical examination of the third stage
By John Dumay, T. Garanina. 2013
387 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/331172477a562f7923b20edb2513b9b9f990fd18
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Maria Chiara Demartini
- Valentina Beretta
- Francesca Ricciardi
- Pina Puntillo
- Cristiana Bernardi
- Linlin Cai
- Yong-fan Li
- Chengwei Li
Citations in the corpus
- Public sector knowledge management: a structured literature review (2015, background): “Researchers have long been accused of doing research that contributes little if anything to practice and this is seen as a major challenge (Evans et al., 2011), and research into public sector KM is no different. As Tucker and Lowe (2014) contend, practitioners are from Mars and academics are from V”
- Smart city intellectual capital: an emerging view of territorial systems innovation management (2015, background): “The IC community has expressed its purpose to start focusing on a wider range of possible IC outcomes, beyond the traditional attention to competitiveness and financial performance (Dumay and Garanina, 2013).”
- Intellectual Capital, Knowledge Sharing, and Innovation Performance: Evidence from the Chinese Construction Industry (2019, background): “The third stage (mid-2000s to early 2010s) has examined how managers can use intellectual capital to manage and run their businesses [29,30] and strengthen their organizations.”
- A review and critique of content analysis as a methodology for inquiring into IC disclosure (2014, methodology): “However, by analysing the body of published CA articles we seek to determine how CA as a research methodology for inquiring into ICD has developed, to see if the focus has changed and outline any possible opportunities for future research in line with developing research based on managing IC in prac”
- An intellectual capital maturity model (ICMM) to improve strategic management in European universities (2015, methodology): “To tackle the problem, we have proposed ICMM specifically tailored for implementation in European universities where it can be easily personalised to the needs of the bottom-up approach to gathering insights into the workings of IC, or to the need to assess the interaction of IC elements rather than”
- Integrated reporting: A structured literature review (2016, methodology): “To develop the framework, we adopted criteria as reviously used by Guthrie et al. (2012) and Dumay and Garanina (2013).”
- IC and public sector: a structured literature review (2015, methodology): “The methodology is similar to other recent reviews in the IC literature (Guthrie et al., 2012; Dumay and Garanina, 2013; Dumay, 2014a; Dumay and Cai, 2014, 2015).”
- Intellectual capital and SMEs’ performance: A structured literature review (2019, methodology): “Meeting this aim is important so as to shed light on the managerial implications of IC exploitation, pursuant of successfully managing SMEs (Dumay & Garanina, 2013; Guthrie et al., 2012).”
- Using content analysis as a research methodology for investigating intellectual capital disclosure : a critique (2015, background): “Additionally, researchers should also be concerned with IC practices inside organisations (see Guthrie et al., 2012; Dumay and Garanina, 2013).”