A comparative study of three turbulence-closure models for the hydrocyclone problem

By J. Delgadillo, R. Rajamani. 2005

178 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Astronomy and Astrophysics, Computational Mechanics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/330629d48e710230aacd87c602d42b214f4597c3

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Astronomy and Astrophysics

1. Bow-yaw Wang
2. Aibing Yu

In Computational Mechanics

1. Bow-yaw Wang
2. Aibing Yu
3. Zongyan Zhou

In Electrical and Electronic Engineering

1. Bow-yaw Wang
2. Aibing Yu

Citations in the corpus

• A review of electrocoagulation technology for the treatment of textile wastewater (2017, background): “The standard K–ε model is suitable for predicting flows with low curvature, whereas when the curvature increases, the RNG K–ε model is more precise for capturing the turbulence fluctuation of swirl flows (Delgadillo and Rajamani 2005, Enciso et al.”
• Numerical study of particle–fluid flow in hydrocyclones with different body dimensions (2006, methodology): “an empirical model developed by Plitt (1976) and Flinthoff et al. (1987), which is often used for the design of hydrocyclones in practice.”