Sexual Selection and Life‐History Decisions: Implications for Supportive Breeding and the Management of Captive Populations

By C. Wedekind. 2002

117 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Genetics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/32f6b2f180c47465f2b0488c9731e8770ccebcae

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

1. A. Hirzel
2. J. Wilcken
3. R. Müller
4. B. Neff
5. Daniel J. Rankin
6. R. Arlettaz
7. R. Swaisgood
8. C. Lees

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

1. Hanna Kokko
2. Daniel J. Rankin
3. T. Pitcher
4. A. Hirzel
5. J. Wilcken
6. R. Müller
7. B. Neff
8. R. Arlettaz

In Genetics

1. Hanna Kokko
2. T. Pitcher
3. Daniel J. Rankin
4. J. Wilcken
5. R. Müller
6. B. Neff
7. A. Hirzel
8. R. Swaisgood

Citations in the corpus

• Current status and future directions of applied behavioral research for animal welfare and conservation (2007, background): “But conservation biologists will argue persuasively that such short-term losses are acceptable when compared to the risks of losing forever genetic diversity in small populations (Wedekind, 2002).”
• Sustaining the Ark: the challenges faced by zoos in maintaining viable populations (2009, background): “Journal compilation c 2009 The Zoological Society of London (Wedekind, 2002).”
• Ecological requirements of reintroduced species and the implications for release policy: the case of the bearded vulture (2004, background): “Usually relying upon individuals stemming from captive stocks (Wedekind 2002), they aim at reinstalling wild populations of extinct species, especially those that have been directly (overkilling) or indirectly (habitat loss, predator or competitor introduction) extirpated by humans (O’Toole, Fieldin”
• Do males matter? The role of males in population dynamics (2007, background): “Recombination is known to have many benefits for the population, and has been used as a major argument for why sex is so prevalent (Hadany and Feldman 2005), and the type of males present as well as female mate choice may affect the effective population size (Wedekind 2002).”
• Potential genetic benefits of mate selection in whitefish (2001, background): “by random outbreeding, is a strategy that will optimally maintain a population (see also Wedekind, 2002 ).”
• Genetic quality and sexual selection: an integrated framework for good genes and compatible genes (2004, methodology): “Table 2 Summary of the two-way anova results in whitefish from Wedekind et al. (2001). The results include source of variation, sum of squares (SS), degrees of freedom (DF), mean square (MS), F statistic, P-value, and variance (σ2)”
• Genetic quality and offspring performance in Chinook salmon: implications for supportive breeding (2007, background): “However, there is an increasing recognition that random mating or genetic diversity does not capture the complexity of genetic quality (Grahn et al. 1998; Wedekind 2002; Wedekind and Müller 2004; Neff and Pitcher 2005).”