The materials genome in action: identifying the performance limits for methane storage

By Cory M. Simon, Jihan Kim, Diego A. Gómez-Gualdrón, Jeffrey S. Camp, Yongchul-Grego Chung, Richard L. Martin, Rocío Mercado, M. Deem, D. Gunter, Maciej Haranczyk and 3 more. 2015

264 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Environmental Chemistry, Inorganic Chemistry, Materials Chemistry

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/32f329457a1f08d5715895b3017fe5649f132f29

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Inorganic Chemistry

1. Berend Smit
2. Kevin Maik Jablonka
3. Randall Q. Snurr
4. David S. Sholl
5. Seyed Mohamad Moosavi
6. Maciej Haranczyk
7. Jeffrey S. Camp
8. Benjamin J. Bucior

In Materials Chemistry

1. David S. Sholl
2. Berend Smit
3. Maciej Haranczyk
4. Kevin Maik Jablonka
5. Seyed Mohamad Moosavi
6. Randall Q. Snurr
7. B. Slater
8. Daniele Ongari

Citations in the corpus

• Understanding the diversity of the metal-organic framework ecosystem (2020, result): “This observation provides an important rationale for the provocative conclusion of Simon et al. 31 that there is no point in looking for new structures for methane storage as they are not expected to perform significantly better for this application.”
• Advances, Updates, and Analytics for the Computation-Ready, Experimental Metal–Organic Framework Database: CoRE MOF 2019 (2019, methodology): “Simon and co-workers previously screened the CoRE MOF 2014 dataset to find materials with high Xe/Kr selectivity.(13) The MOF with the highest selectivity found in their work was KAXQIL, also known as SBMOF-1, a calcium based MOF synthesized by Banerjee et al.”