Conceptualizing the Domestic Impact of Europe

792 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Eastern Enlargement Ten Years On: Transcending the East–West Divide? (2014, methodology): “Regarding the mode of the EU’s influence, in contrast to conditionality, other studies conceptualized EU policy as most effective in precisely those cases where it linked up with domestic factors (Börzel and Risse, 2003; Jacoby, 2004; Haughton, 2012) or where it most forcefully shamed ECE actors int”
The politics of governance architectures: creation, change and effects of the EU Lisbon Strategy (2011, background): “One classic proposition in this field is that, given pressure on national system arising out of EU commitments, the impact at the national level is largely associated with the presence of national-specific institutional variables that define the intermediate level of pressure (Börzel and Risse 2003)”
The lessons of policy learning: types, triggers, hindrances and pathologies (2018, neutral): “For other triggers, we recall the findings of the literature on Europeanisation (Börzel and Risse, 2003).”
Ambiguity and choice in European public policy (2008, background): “While some constructivists have found entrepreneurs particularly active in EU socialization and social learning (e.g. Checkel 2001; Börzel and Risse 2003), multiple streams extends their impact beyond norm diffusion to the formal process of policy formation.”