The RDoC framework: facilitating transition from ICD/DSM to dimensional approaches that integrate neuroscience and psychopathology

By B. Cuthbert. World Psychiatry, 2014

1,251 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Philosophy

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/32c9665f1a6d55af1089796cbd6e5af0e3d9d8d1

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

1. Naomi P. Friedman
2. Trevor W. Robbins
3. Vikram Patel
4. Dan J Stein
5. R. Engle
6. Nash Unsworth
7. K. Paap
8. Michael J Frank

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

1. Trevor W. Robbins
2. Naomi P. Friedman
3. Vikram Patel
4. Dan J Stein
5. K. Paap
6. Virginia Valian
7. Klaus Oberauer
8. Samaneh Mohammadi

In Philosophy

1. Trevor W. Robbins
2. Naomi P. Friedman

Citations in the corpus

• The role of prefrontal cortex in cognitive control and executive function (2021, background): “Such refinements could perhaps enhance genetic studies, as well as improve new nosological systems such as United States’ National Institute of Mental Health’s Research Domain Criteria (RDoC) [231], a research framework that advocates examining mental disorders from the perspective of basic dimensio”
• The Lancet Commission on global mental health and sustainable development. (2018, background): “The Research Domain Criteria framework 70 aims to uncover underlying mechanisms (deep phenotypes) that influence cognitive, affective, and behavioural functioning by use of evidence from diverse disciplines.”