Measuring Urban Design: Metrics for Livable Places
By R. Ewing, Otto Clemente, K. Neckerman, Marnie Purciel-Hill, J. Quinn, A. Rundle. 2013
321 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Building and Construction, Sociology and Political Science, Urban Studies
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/32c495665ebd62544698030fdffd8e6b049ff39d
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
Citations in the corpus
- Subjective and Objective Measures of Streetscape Perceptions: Relationships with Property Value in Shanghai (2021, methodology): “Built on prior quantitative studies in urban design quality (Ewing & Clemente, 2013; Ewing & Handy, 2009; Ma et al., 2021) and emerging applications in deep learning and SVI in urban scene perceptions (Naik et al., 2014; Zhou et al., 2019), we integrated and extended existing frameworks to (1)…”
- Does block size matter? The impact of urban design on economic vitality for Chinese cities (2019, background): “Second, other indicators for measuring urban design at a finer level as proposed by Ewing and Clemente (2013), e.g. imageability, enclosure, human scale, transparency, and complexity, could also be included in the regression models to gain more in-depth information on the effect of urban design on…”