Lines, outlines, and landmarks: morphometric analyses of leaves of Acer rubrum, Acer saccharinum (Aceraceae) and their hybrid

By R. Jensen, Kristen M. Ciofani, Lydia Miramontes. 2002

117 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Geometric morphometrics as a tool for understanding Dactylorhiza (Orchidaceae) diversity in European Russia (2005, unknown): “…applications of TPS and other geometric morphometry methods (e.g. Ray, 1992; Kores, Molvray & Darwin, 1993; Pavlinov, 2000; Rueber & Adams, 2001; Jensen et al. , 2002; Guill, Heins & Hood, 2003), but most of them have hitherto been performed on zoological and/or palaeontological objects 2 A. B.…”
Plant species identification using digital morphometrics: A review (2012, background): “Jensen, Ciofani, and Miramontes (2002) studied three species of Acer using the angles and distances between the manually located lobe apices and sinus bases.”
Quantitative evaluation of Tarocco sweet orange fruit shape using optoelectronic elliptic Fourier based analysis (2009, methodology): “been successfully used to asses differences among leaves (White et al., 1988; Jensen et al., 2002; Neto et al., 2006), leaflets (Furuta et al.”
Multiple Multilocus DNA Barcodes from the Plastid Genome Discriminate Plant Species Equally Well (2008, unknown): “[32–34]), polyploidy (e.”