The Concept of Comonotonicity in Actuarial Science and Finance: Applications
By Jan Dhaene, Michel Denuit, Marc J. Goovaerts, Rob Kaas, David Vyncke. 2002
418 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Demography, Finance, Management Science and Operations Research
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/3287e436f2c092bb1548314604f7039202912385
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Demography
- Jan Dhaene
- Michel Denuit
- Rob Kaas
- Marc J. Goovaerts
- Emiliano A. Valdez
- Masaaki Kijima
- Tony Siu Tung Wong
- Andrew Tang
In Finance
- Jan Dhaene
- Marc J. Goovaerts
- Michel Denuit
- Rob Kaas
- David Hobson *
- Steven Vanduffel
- Emiliano A. Valdez
- Wim Schoutens
In Management Science and Operations Research
- Jan Dhaene
- Michel Denuit
- Marc J. Goovaerts
- Rob Kaas
- Emiliano A. Valdez
- Steven Vanduffel
- Andrew Tang
- Wim Schoutens
Citations in the corpus
- After VaR: The Theory, Estimation, and Insurance Applications of Quantile-Based Risk Measures (2006, neutral): “Comonotonicity approaches (e.g., Dhaene et al., 2003a,b): These apply to situations where we are interested in the sums of random variables and cannot plausibly assume that these random variables are independent.”
- Financial valuation of guaranteed minimum withdrawal benefits (2006, background): “SeeTurnbull and Wakeman (1991), Milevsky and Posner (1998), Bakshi and Madan (2002), Nielsen and Sandmann (2003)or Dhaene et al. (2001), for a review of the various approaches.”
- Pricing of Ratchet Equity-Indexed Annuities under Stochastic Interest Rates ? (2007, background): “For the theoretical aspects of this approach, see Denuit et al. (2002a).”
- Worst VaR scenarios (2005, neutral): “For an in depth dis cussion of comonotonicity, see Dhaene et al. (2001).”
- Comparing Approximations for Risk Measures of Sums of Nonindependent Lognormal Random Variables (2005, neutral): “Notice that this optimal choice for is slightly different from the choice that was made for this r.v. in Dhaene et al. (2002b).”
- Modeling Dependent Risks with Multivariate Erlang Mixtures (2009, background): “The notation is slightly different from that in Dhaene et al. (2002a).”
- Bounds for the price of discrete arithmetic Asian options (2006, positive): “We also show in Section 2.3 how to sharpen the improved comonotonic upper bound of Kaas et al. (2000) and Dhaene et al. (2002a) by obtaining another so-called partially exact/comonotonic upper bound which consists of an exact part of the option price and some improved comonotonic upper bound for…”
- Comonotonic Approximations for Optimal Portfolio Selection Problems (2005, background): “αi eZi ( 13 ) where the αi are non-negative constants and the Zi are linear combinations of the components of the random vector (Y1 ,Y 2,··· ,Y n) which is assumed to have a multivariate normal distribution:”
- Risk Measures and Comonotonicity: A Review (2006, neutral): “[8,9].”
- The Skorokhod Embedding Problem and Model-Independent Bounds for Option Prices (2011, background): “It turns out that the model independent upper bound on the price of a basket option is associated with a model when the assets are co-monotonic, see Dhaene et al [21] or Hobson et al [34].”
- Copulas: A Review and Recent Developments (2006, background): “Additional properties, examples, applications in Finance and Insurance can be found in Dhaene et al.[35,36], Theorem (Characterization of Comonotonicity, Dhaene et al.[35]).”
- Actuarial Theory for Dependent Risks: Measures, Orders and Models (2005, methodology): “1 Description of the model In two seminal papers, Dionne and Vanasse (1989, 1992) proposed a credibility model which integrates a priori and a posteriori information on an individual basis. These authors introduced a regression component into the Poisson counting model in order to use all available ”
- The concept of comonotonicity in actuarial science and finance: theory (2002, background): “(14) Note that only values of p corresponding to a horizontal segment of FX lead to different values of F−1 X (p), F −1+ X (p) and F −1(α) X (p).”
- Remarks on quantiles and distortion risk measures (2012, neutral): “The proofs of the equivalence of the stated assumptions and of (4) follow from the observation that the additivity property (with respect to g) holds for both integrals in (3).”
- General closed-form basket option pricing bounds (2016, neutral): “The newly introduced basket involves the components of the comonotonic version of the original random vector, see for example Dhaene et al. (2002b) and Dhaene et al. (2002a).”