Prolific Domains: On the Anti-Locality of movement dependencies

By K. Grohmann. 2003

333 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

On the locality of left branch extraction and the structure of NP (2005, background): “Grohmann (2000, 2003a) does not explicitly discuss anti-locality with respect to movement within the traditional NP. (He discusses only movement in the clausal domain).”
Resumptive pronouns and Matching effects in Zurich German Relative clauses as distributed deletion (2005, unknown): “As for approaches that consider resumptives the spell-out of a trace/copy, I will not review them in much detail because most approaches that are available are either not very detailed (Pesetsky 1998) or are based on different data (left-dislocation, Grohmann 2003).”
On Multidominance and Linearization (2009, background): “…in terms of multidominance: (28) a. b. 10 I am aware of proposals involving spelled-out copies or traces for particular phenomena such as resumptive pronouns and wh-copying; for discussion, see Aoun & Li 2003, Grohmann 2003, Nunes 2004, Barbiers et al. 2008, and Schippers 2008, among others.”
Semantic Correlates of the NP/DP Parameter (2008, background): “However, movement of NP-adjoined AP to SpecDP violates anti-locality (see, e.g., Bošković 1994, 1997, Grohmann 2003, Abels 2003, Ticio 2003, Boeckx 2007), the ban on movement that is too short which requires movement to cross at least one full phrasal boundary.”