Disentanglement by Nonlinear ICA with General Incompressible-flow Networks (GIN)

By Peter Sorrenson, Carsten Rother, Ullrich Köthe. 2020

137 citations recorded by the source corpus.

A central question of representation learning asks under which conditions it is possible to reconstruct the true latent variables of an arbitrarily complex generative process. Recent breakthrough work by Khemakhem et al. (2019) on nonlinear ICA has answered this question for a broad class of conditional generative processes. We extend this important result in a direction relevant for application to real-world data. First, we generalize the theory to the case of unknown intrinsic problem dimension and prove that in some special (but not very restrictive) cases, informative latent variables will be automatically separated from noise by an estimating model. Furthermore, the recovered informative latent variables will be in one-to-one correspondence with the true latent variables of the generating process, up to a trivial component-wise transformation. Second, we introduce a modification of the RealNVP invertible neural network architecture (Dinh et al. (2016)) which is particularly suitable for this type of problem: the General Incompressible-flow Network (GIN). Experiments on artificial data and EMNIST demonstrate that theoretical predictions are indeed verified in practice. In particular, we provide a detailed set of exactly 22 informative latent variables extracted from EMNIST.

Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Representation & Self-Supervised Learning, Signal Processing

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Artificial Intelligence

  1. Bernhard Schölkopf
  2. Yoshua Bengio
  3. Francesco Locatello
  4. Stefan Bauer
  5. Olivier Bachem
  6. Sergey Levine
  7. Simon Lacoste-Julien
  8. Dacheng Tao

In Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition

  1. Luc Van Gool
  2. Dacheng Tao
  3. Trevor Darrell
  4. Ming-Hsuan Yang
  5. Bernt Schiele
  6. Jitendra Malik
  7. Xiaogang Wang
  8. Bernhard Schölkopf

In Representation & Self-Supervised Learning

  1. Bernhard Schölkopf
  2. Francesco Locatello
  3. Stefan Bauer
  4. Olivier Bachem
  5. Yash Sharma
  6. Gunnar Rätsch
  7. Michael Tschannen
  8. Wieland Brendel

In Signal Processing

  1. Bernhard Schölkopf
  2. Francesco Locatello
  3. Stefan Bauer
  4. Olivier Bachem
  5. Diederik P. Kingma
  6. Sylvain Gelly
  7. Mario Lucic
  8. Wieland Brendel

Citations in the corpus