TEMPOROSPATIAL DISTRIBUTIONS OF ELK, MULE DEER, AND CATTLE: RESOURCE PARTITIONING AND COMPETITIVE DISPLACEMENT
By K. Stewart, R. Terry Bowyer, J. Kie, N. Cimon, B. Johnson. 2002
281 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Ecology, Nature and Landscape Conservation
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/326a8287369513d6a6c459dd1d65f67e15144040
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Ecology
- M. Boyce
- J. Kie
- R. Terry Bowyer
- Ryan A. Long
- Terry Bowyer
- Evelyn H. Merrill
- C. Anderson
- Jacqui Frair
In Nature and Landscape Conservation
Citations in the corpus
- Resource Selection and Movements by Female Mule Deer Odocoileus hemionus: Effects of Reproductive Stage (2009, methodology): “Previous work at Starkey has documented strong avoidance of elk by female mule deer (Johnson et al. 2000, Stewart et al. 2002).”
- Habitat selection by mule deer during migration: effects of landscape structure and natural-gas development (2012, background): “Mule deer demonstrate strong avoidance of elk (Johnson et al. 2000, Stewart et al. 2002, Long et al. 2008, Stewart et al. 2010), and elk occur in large herds throughout the Piceance Basin (White et al. 2001).”
- Behavior and nutritional condition buffer a large‐bodied endotherm against direct and indirect effects of climate (2014, methodology): “Seasons were delineated independently for each study site by using a climograph (e.g., Stewart et al. 2002) to group months that had similar ranges of average temperature and precipitation during 1954–2012.”
- DAILY AND SEASONAL MOVEMENTS AND HABITAT USE BY FEMALE ROCKY MOUNTAIN ELK AND MULE DEER (2003, background): “These midsummer patterns of habitat use by deer may have resulted from deer avoiding concentrations of elk (Johnson et al. 2000; Stewart et al. 2002).”
- Niche partitioning among mule deer, elk, and cattle: Do stable isotopes reflect dietary niche? (2003, methodology): “Stewart et al. (2002) strongly inferred competition among mule deer (Odocoileus hemionus), North American elk (Cervus elaphus), and introduced cattle (Bos taurus) along two axes, spatial separation and temporal avoidance, using modern regression methods (Fox & Luo, 1996; Luo, Monamy & Fox, 1998).”
- SEXUAL SEGREGATION IN RUMINANTS: DEFINITIONS, HYPOTHESES, AND IMPLICATIONS FOR CONSERVATION AND MANAGEMENT (2004, background): “…species (Bowyer et al. 2001b; Kie and Bowyer 1999; Stewart et al. 2003b), these large mammals should be considered in a niche framework wherein overlap on 1 niche axis is likely accompanied by avoidance on another (Bowyer and Kie 2004; Kie and Bowyer 1999; Stewart et al. 2002, 2003a; Table 1; Fig.”
- Factors influencing female home range sizes in elk (Cervus elaphus) in North American landscapes (2005, background): “…may be partially attributable to factors not measured here, such as digestible fiber and protein content of forage (Langvatn and Hanley 1993; Wilmshurst et al. 1995), or availability of water (Bowyer 1981; Stewart et al. 2002), which should influence patch selection and movement decisions.”