Combined application of cheminformatics- and physical force field-based scoring functions improves binding affinity prediction for CSAR datasets
By Jui-Hua Hsieh, Shuangye Yin, Shubin Liu, Alexander Sedykh, N. V. Dokholyan, Alexander Tropsha. 2011
22 citations recorded by the source corpus.
The curated CSAR-NRC benchmark sets provide valuable opportunity for testing or comparing the performance of both existing and novel scoring functions. We apply two different scoring functions, both independently and in combination, to predict binding affinity of ligands in the CSAR-NRC datasets. One, reported here for the first time, employs multiple chemical-geometrical descriptors of the protein-ligand interface to develop Quantitative Structure – Binding Affinity Relationships (QSBAR) models; these models are then used to predict binding affinity of ligands in the external dataset. Second is a physical force field-based scoring function, MedusaScore. We show that both individual scoring functions achieve statistically significant prediction accuracies with the squared correlation coefficient (R2) between actual and predicted binding affinity of 0.44/0.53 (Set1/Set2) with QSBAR models and 0.34/0.47 (Set1/Set2) with MedusaScore. Importantly, we find that the combination of QSBAR models and MedusaScore into consensus scoring function affords higher prediction accuracy than any of the contributing methods achieving R2 of 0.45/0.58 (Set1/Set2). Furthermore, we identify several chemical features and non-covalent interactions that may be responsible for the inaccurate prediction of binding affinity for several ligands by the scoring functions employed in this study.
Subfields: Computational Theory and Mathematics, Materials Chemistry, Molecular Biology
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Computational Theory and Mathematics
In Materials Chemistry
In Molecular Biology
Citations in the corpus
- Latest developments in molecular docking: 2010–2011 in review (2013, methodology): “[91] Although these aspects represent known challenges, [4] the CSAR exercise is a novel approach to addressing them in a community-wide fashion.”