Numerical and experimental study of mechanisms responsible for turbulent secondary flows in boundary layer flows over spanwise heterogeneous roughness
By William Anderson, J. Barros, Kenneth T. Christensen, Ankita Awasthi. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 2015
195 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Computational Mechanics, Environmental Engineering, Global and Planetary Change
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/32620f37928621c692a67fee9297cc756b67a8f4
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Computational Mechanics
- M. Calaf
- C. Vanderwel
- Bharathram Ganapathisubramani
- S. Salesky
- William Anderson
- Jeremy A. Gibbs
- Rob Stoll
- Ivan Marusic
In Environmental Engineering
- M. Calaf
- C. Vanderwel
- Bharathram Ganapathisubramani
- S. Salesky
- William Anderson
- Jeremy A. Gibbs
- Rob Stoll
- Fernando Port'e-Agel
In Global and Planetary Change
- C. Vanderwel
- Bharathram Ganapathisubramani
- M. Calaf
- S. Salesky
- William Anderson
- Jeremy A. Gibbs
- Rob Stoll
- Ivan Marusic
Citations in the corpus
- Effects of spanwise spacing on large-scale secondary flows in rough-wall turbulent boundary layers (2015, methodology): “Anderson et al. (2015) stressed the importance of the spanwise gradients of the shear stresses and the role they play in driving the secondary vortices, which were interpreted as Prantl’s secondary flows of the second kind; the fact that the stresses behave similarly in the current measurements to…”
- Large-Eddy Simulation of the Atmospheric Boundary Layer (2020, background): “It has been shown (Anderson et al. 2015) that a turbulence production–dissipation imbalance above the “rough” zones necessitates a downwelling of momentum from aloft (Hinze 1967), which thus necessitates a lateral outflow and corresponding upwelling across the “smooth” areas.”