Travel motivations and destination choice: A study of British outbound market

By S. Jang, Liping A. Cai. 2002

385 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science, Transportation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/326033dbdb2b7cac476fd2a5c2e27f3d8a064e58

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Social Psychology

In Sociology and Political Science

In Transportation

Citations in the corpus

Islamic tourism: an empirical examination of travel motivation and satisfaction in Malaysia (2017, methodology): “…and select their destinations according to different push-and-pull motivational factors (Baloglu & Uysal, 1996; Chul Oh, Uysal, & Weaver, 1995; Crompton, 1979; Dann, 1981; Iso-Ahola, 1982; Jang & Cai, 2002; Kim & Lee, 2002; Kozak, 2002; Mansfeld, 1992; Uysal & Jurowski, 1994; Yoon & Uysal, 2005).”
Linking the dots among destination images, place attachment, and revisit intentions: A study among British and Russian tourists (2017, background): “In this vein, Jang & Cai (2002) concluded that the most important motives for British tourists who travel to overseas destinations were “knowledge seeking”, “escape”, “family and friend togetherness”.”
An Extension of the Theory of Planned Behavior Model for Tourists (2012, methodology): “These 27 motivation items were then combined with measurements from previous research (e.g., Crompton, 1979; Dann, 1981; Fodness, 1994; Hsu & Lam, 2003; Jang & Cai, 2002; Zhang & Lam, 1999) with a total of 38 items generated for pilot studies.”
Senior Travelers’ Motivations and Future Behavioral Intentions: THE CASE OF NICE (2012, background): “This classification remains the most widely accepted travel motivation theory (Jang & Cai, 2002; Jang et al., 2009).”
Predicting Wine Tourism Intention: Destination Image and Self-congruity (2014, methodology): “Additional items were based on the results from qualitative research, with support from Jang and Cai, 2002; Baloglu, 2000; and Beerli & Martín, 2004a).”
Mainland Chinese residents' perceptions and motivations of visiting Hong Kong: Evidence from focus group interviews (2005, background): “Destination managers and marketers need to note how their destinations are placed in terms of travelers' motivations (Jang & Cai, 2002 ).”
Nature-Based Tourism: Motivation and Subjective Well-Being (2015, background): “There are a number of theories to explain tourists’ motivations, such as the push–pull model (Crompton, 1979; Jang & Cai, 2002; Uysal & Jurowski, 1994), the travel career ladder (Pearce & Lee, 2005), and the functional theory (Fodness, 1994; Katz, 1960).”
Analysis of Structural Equation Model for the Student Pleasure Travel Market: Motivation, Involvement, Satisfaction, and Destination Loyalty (2008, background): “…have sought to understand how and why consumers make travel decisions about domestic or international travel by focusing on push and pull motivational factors (Backman, Backman, Uysal, & Sunshine, 1995; Baloglu & Uysal, 1996; Jang & Cai, 2002; Kim & Lee, 2002; Sirakaya, Uysal, & Yoshioka, 2003).”
Understanding Potential and Repeat Visitors’ Travel Intentions: The Roles of Travel Motivations, Destination Image, and Visitor Image Congruity (2021, background): “However, it was not clear why this was the case, as previous studies have shown this motivation to be an important predictor of international travel (e.g., Assiouras et al. 2015; Dayour and Adongo 2015; Jang and Cai 2002).”
Affect, Travel Motivation, and Travel Intention: a Senior Market (2009, methodology): “Drawing on the study of attitudes by Katz (1960) and Smith, Bruner, and White (1956), Fodness (1994) applied the functional theory to the examination of travel motivations.”