The 2001 US Naval Observatory Double Star CD-ROM. II. The Fifth Catalog of Orbits of Visual Binary Stars
By W. Hartkopf, B. Mason, C. E. Worley. 2001
253 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Astronomy and Astrophysics
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/322af3d07a988f3b6d8fa6f783f57884b5f7e315
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Astronomy and Astrophysics
Citations in the corpus
- SEPARATED FRINGE PACKET OBSERVATIONS WITH THE CHARA ARRAY. II. ω ANDROMEDA, HD 178911, AND ξ CEPHEI (2014, methodology): “The calculated masses are 0.963±0.049 M⊙ and 0.860±0.051 M⊙ for the components and an orbital grade of 1 determined by criteria of the Sixth Orbital Catalog (Hartkopf et al. 2001a).”
- THE HIGH ANGULAR RESOLUTION MULTIPLICITY OF MASSIVE STARS (2008, methodology): “′′20 pair in 1987; however, this discovery has never been confirmed, with nine other unresolved observations published to date (Hartkopf et al. 2001b).”
- Adaptive Optics Photometry and Astrometry of Binary Stars. II. A Multiplicity Survey of B Stars (2005, methodology): “All available measures for these pairs were extracted from the WDS (Mason et al. 2001b) and individual measures were weighted following the precepts of Hartkopf et al. (2001).”
- SPECKLE INTERFEROMETRY AT SOAR IN 2010 AND 2011: MEASURES, ORBITS, AND RECTILINEAR FITS (2012, methodology): “Column 11 gives a reference for the previous “preferred” published orbit currently listed in the Sixth Orbit Catalog; an asterisk in Column 12 indicates that a note for this system may be found in Section 4 below.”
- CCD SPECKLE OBSERVATIONS OF BINARY STARS WITH THE WIYN TELESCOPE. VI. MEASURES DURING 2007–2008 (2009, methodology): “We still considered only orbits of either Grade 1 or Grade 2 in the Sixth Catalogue of Orbits of Visual Binary Stars (Hartkopf et al. 2001a) which had stated uncertainties in the orbital elements, but we allowed the uncertainties in the ephemeris positions we calculated to be larger than in our prev”
- New and Confirmed Triple Systems with Luminous Cool Primaries and Hot Companions (2004, methodology): “For the systems in the Sixth Orbit Catalog (Hartkopf et al. 2001a) having orbital inclinations, the agreement in log sin i is usually within 0.02 dex.”
- THE PALOMAR/KECK ADAPTIVE OPTICS SURVEY OF YOUNG SOLAR ANALOGS: EVIDENCE FOR A UNIVERSAL COMPANION MASS FUNCTION (2008, methodology): “We selected binary stars with well-known ephemeris from the Sixth Orbit Catalog (Hartkopf et al. 2001; Hartkopf & Mason 2003), combining binaries with grade 1 (accurately determined, short-period) and grade 4 (less accurately known, longerperiod) orbital solutions, as recommended for astrometric cal”
- Mind Your Ps and Qs: The Interrelation between Period (P) and Mass-ratio (Q) Distributions of Binary Stars (2016, background): “Malkov et al. (2012) compiled a set of VBs with known distances, measured primary spectral types, and orbits of high quality from both the Catalog of Orbits and Ephemerides of Visual Double Stars (Docobo et al. 2001) and the Sixth Catalog of Visual Binary Stars (Hartkopf et al. 2001).”
- A CHARA ARRAY SURVEY OF CIRCUMSTELLAR DISKS AROUND NEARBY Be-TYPE STARS (2013, methodology): “There are only four measurements in the Fourth Catalog of Interferometric Measurements of Binary Stars (Hartkopf et al. 2001), but we used these to arrive at the preliminary orbital elements presented in Table 5.”
- Binary Star Orbits. V. The Nearby White Dwarf/Red Dwarf Pair 40 Eri BC (2017, methodology): “2, 3 Burnham, S.W. 1906, A General Catalogue of Double Stars Within 120◦ of the North Pole (Washington, DC: Carnegie Institution of Washington) Burnham, S.W. 1913, Measures of Proper Motion Stars Made with the 40-inch Refractor of the Yerkes Observatory in the Years 1907 to 1912 (Washington, DC: Car”
- The Tycho Double Star Catalogue (2002, unknown): “As an assessment of the quality of double star measures from Tycho-2, they have been compared to systems with calibration quality orbits (see the 5th Orbit Catalog, Hartkopf et al. 2001).”