Research designs for studies evaluating the effectiveness of change and improvement strategies

By M. Eccles, Jeremy M. Grimshaw, Martin Campbell, C. Ramsay. BMJ Quality & Safety, 2003

638 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: General Health Professions, Management Science and Operations Research

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/3228c6fa2f318a9be3fc197c0bcd8ad2f1ff7d63

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In General Health Professions

1. S. Richards
2. A. Dickens
3. C. Greaves
4. John L Campbell
5. J. Matjasko
6. Melissa K. Holt

Citations in the corpus

• Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs in Implementation Research (2019, background): “widespread implementation of policy mandates, quality improvement initiatives, or dissemination campaigns (Eccles et al., 2003).”
• Interventions targeting social isolation in older people: a systematic review (2011, background): “The interventions may have been poorly developed, lacking appropriate theoretical basis and subsequent components to impact on the measured outcome domains [82,83].”
• A systematic review of primary prevention strategies for sexual violence perpetration (2014, methodology): “…designs were considered non - rigorous evaluation designs , for the purposes of examining effectiveness in this review, consistent with standards of prevention science and evaluation research (e.g., Eccles, Grimshaw, Campbell, & Ramsay, 2003; Flay et al., 2005; Shadish, Cook, & Campbell, 2002).”