Recursive representation of the torus 1-point conformal block
By L. Hadasz, Z. Jaskólski, Paulina Suchanek. 2009
133 citations recorded by the source corpus.
The recursive relation for the 1-point conformal block on a torus is derived and used to prove the identities between conformal blocks recently conjectured by Poghossian in [1]. As an illustration of the efficiency of the recurrence method the modular invariance of the 1-point Liouville correlation function is numerically analyzed.
Subfields: Applied Mathematics, Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics, Geometry and Topology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/321a15615c145bce8b1079a4e2259e18d45c5c19
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Applied Mathematics
In Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics
In Geometry and Topology
Citations in the corpus
- Wild quiver gauge theories (2011, background): “5) was proved in [46] by using recursion relations [47, 48, 49, 50].”
- On Combinatorial Expansion of the Conformal Blocks Arising from AGT Conjecture (2010, methodology): “Recently, the recursive procedure of [6] was generalized to the case of one-point conformal block on a torus in [7].”
- Virasoro conformal blocks in closed form (2015, background): “7-8 of [24].”
- A cardy formula for three-point coefficients or how the black hole got its spots (2016, methodology): “dimensions (H;H) and ( ;) and the central charge c. We will restrict our attention to the case c>1. The torus block FH ;c (q) can be computed algorithmically using the Virasoro algebra (see e.g. [10] for a nice review). For example, one can compute the coecients in the qexpansion explicitly: FH ;”
- On AGT conjecture (2009, background): “idered in [11]. As it follows from the results of the paper [12] the former is the particular case of it. Reccursion formula (1.22) derived in this paper was considered recently in [13] and proved in [14]. – 2 – where ∆m,n is the conformal dimension of degenerate field (1.4). To see this let us consi”