OWL Web Ontology Language Reference-W3C Recommen-dation

1,223 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

A Tableaux Decision Procedure for SHOIQ (2005, methodology): “…[McGuinness & Wright, 1998], and information integration [Calvanese et al., 1998]), they are perhaps best known as the basis for widely used ontology languages such as OIL, DAML+OIL and OWL [Horrocks et al., 2003], the last of which is now a W3C recommendation [Bechhofer et al., 2004].”
Swoop: A Web Ontology Editing Browser (2006, unknown): “Swoop is built primarily as a Web Ontology Browser and Editor, i.e., it is tailored specifically for OWL [ 1 ] ontologies.”
Reducing OWL Entailment to Description Logic Satisfability (2003, methodology): “In Section 5 we will examine these differences in more detail, and explore their impact on the reduction from OWL entailment to description logic satisfiability.”
Ontology change: classification and survey (2008, background): “Under one understanding (Kalfoglou & Schorlemmer 2003), ontology translation refers to the process of changing the formal representation of the ontology from one language to another (say from OWL (Dean et al. 2004) to RDF (Miller et al. 2006)).”
SOUPA: standard ontology for ubiquitous and pervasive applications (2004, background): “Although the semantics for importing ontologies is well defined [2], by choosing not to use this approach we can effectively limit the overhead in requiring reasoning engines to import ontologies that may be irrelevant to pervasive computing applications.”