Indirect fuel use change (IFUC) and the lifecycle environmental impact of biofuel policies
By Deepak Rajagopal, G. Hochman, David Zilberman. 2011
148 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Biomedical Engineering, Environmental Engineering, Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/32112c85a7da95d0134fd125e60ed76ec4578d50
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Biomedical Engineering
In Environmental Engineering
- Nuri Cihat Onat
- Scott Cloutier
- Anthony Halog
- Murat Kucukvar
- R. Plevin
- Felix Creutzig
- M. Delucchi
- Yi Yang
In Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
- Nuri Cihat Onat
- Scott Cloutier
- Murat Kucukvar
- Anthony Halog
- Felix Creutzig
- M. Delucchi
- Yi Yang
- Sangwon Suh
Citations in the corpus
- Integrating Global Climate Change Mitigation Goals with Other Sustainability Objectives: A Synthesis (2015, unknown): “Many studies discuss the example of biofuel deployment and its effect on s on global fuel consumption, but they do not agree on its quantitative importance (e.g., 50, 51).”
- Systems Thinking for Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment: A Review of Recent Developments, Applications, and Future Perspectives (2017, background): “For example, biofuels can have indirect land use change offsetting the environmental benefits [128].”
- Using Attributional Life Cycle Assessment to Estimate Climate‐Change Mitigation Benefits Misleads Policy Makers (2014, background): “The greater use of biofuel and reduced use of gasoline in the policy region shifts the global demand curve for gasoline inward, resulting in a reduction in the global price of gasoline and petroleum relative to the baseline without the policy (USEPA 2010; Rajagopal et al. 2011; de Gorter 2010).”