How to find what's in a name: Scrutinizing the optimality of five scoring algorithms for the name‐letter task

By Etienne P LeBel, Bertram Gawronski. 2009

133 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/320b0fda6b4aa8a59c60145c2fec58859387dc93

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

1. M. Back
2. Boris Egloff
3. S. Schmukle
4. Sascha Krause
5. A. Greenwald
6. Malte Friese
7. D. Chugh
8. Brian A. Nosek

In Social Psychology

1. S. Schmukle
2. Boris Egloff
3. M. Back
4. Sascha Krause

In Sociology and Political Science

1. M. Back
2. S. Schmukle
3. Boris Egloff
4. Sascha Krause
5. A. Greenwald
6. Malte Friese
7. Brian A. Nosek
8. Mahzarin R. Banaji

Citations in the corpus

• Reliability of Implicit Self–Esteem Measures Revisited (2011, methodology): “Thus, in line with LeBel and Gawronski (2009), we too recommend using the I-algorithm for the computation of self-esteem NLT scores.”