Explaining International Fertility Differences

119 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Demographic Patterns and Household Saving in China (2015, unknown): “In the baseline version of the model, η equals 0.76, as taken from the Manuelli and Seshadri (2009) study.”
The End of Economic Growth? Unintended Consequences of a Declining Population (2020, background): “Manuelli and Seshadri (2009) explain the heterogeneity in international fertility rates by emphasizing that taxes and transfers in Europe may in part be responsible for low fertility.”
The Economic and Demographic Transition, Mortality, and Comparative Development (2013, unknown): “Illustrating the predictions of Proposition 5, the model dynamics display an extended period of virtually stagnant In this respect, the purpose of our analysis differs from that of Manuelli and Sheshadri (2008), who calibrate an extended Barro-Becker framework to the US in order to investigate the r”
The Quantitative Role of Child Care for Female Labor Force Participation and Fertility (2016, unknown): “Differences along other dimensions, in particular aspects of taxation, might matter much more, see e.g. Jaumotte (2003) or Manuelli and Seshadri (2009).”
Convergence and Modernization Revisited (2012, unknown): “See Manuelli and Seshadri (2009).”