The Big Chill: The WTO and Multilateral Environmental Agreements

By R. Eckersley. Global Environmental Politics, 2004

146 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Political Science and International Relations, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/320611196fe5b30e22c435ad9d3c60dde3e563f0

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

1. Evgeny Postnikov
2. David M. Lodge
3. R. Falkner
4. D. Finnoff
5. Ida Bastiaens

In Political Science and International Relations

1. Evgeny Postnikov
2. R. Falkner
3. Ida Bastiaens

In Strategy and Management

1. Evgeny Postnikov
2. R. Falkner
3. Ida Bastiaens

Citations in the corpus

• Greening up: the effects of environmental standards in EU and US trade agreements (2017, background): “…limited; World Trade Organization (WTO) rules do not explicitly promote environmental goals, and further discussion on environmental policy integration in the WTO has stalled due to developing countries’ concern about green protectionism (Eckersley 2004, Neumayer 2004, Gabler 2010, Johnson 2015).”
• The Rise of Renewable Energy Protectionism: Emerging Trade Conflicts and Implications for Low Carbon Development (2014, unknown): “Eckersley 2004.”
• The political economy of ‘normative power’ Europe: EU environmental leadership in international biotechnology regulation (2007, background): “EU leadership has been critical to creating an international biosafety regime and establishing the principle of precaution in international biotechnology regulation–a highly controversial, emerging, norm in international environmental law and politics that stands in competition to the norms and prin”
• Risk Analysis and Bioeconomics of Invasive Species to Inform Policy and Management (2016, background): “trade rules had a chilling effect on national environmental regulations (48).”