Causality in the freedom-growth relationship
By John W. Dawson. 2003
367 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Information Systems, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/3200ceb926c4ff3d2dcd31fe60cb58eb0dee91cd
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Economics and Econometrics
- Niclas Berggren
- Rachel L. Mathers
- Claudia R. Williamson
- Andreas Bergh
- A. Z. Baharumshah
- M. Islam
- Andrew Williams
- Abu Siddique
In Information Systems
- Andreas Bergh
- Rachel L. Mathers
- Niclas Berggren
- Andrew Williams
- Abu Siddique
- Claudia R. Williamson
- G. Hoover
- Stephan F. Gohmann
In Sociology and Political Science
- Andreas Bergh
- Niclas Berggren
- Rachel L. Mathers
- Claudia R. Williamson
- Ly Slesman
- A. Z. Baharumshah
- Wahabuddin Ra'ees
- M. Islam
Citations in the corpus
- Government size and growth: Accounting for economic freedom and globalization (2010, methodology): “Using Granger causality tests, both Heckelman (2000) and Dawson (2003) find that the level of economic freedom Granger 4 Skocpol (1990) described state capacity as the ability of states to achieve official goals, especially over the opposition of powerful social groups or in the face of difficult…”
- Economic freedom, culture, and growth (2011, methodology): “This methodology is common in the economic freedom literature (for example, see Gwartney et al. 1999; Dawson 2003).”
- Market oriented institutions and policies and economic growth: A critical survey (2006, neutral): “Dawson (1998) reports evidence in favour of both a direct productive efficiency and indirect investment effect. Likewise, Bengoa and Sanches-Robles (2003) report a positive impact of economic freedom on Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) in their panel of 18 Latin American countries.”
- Does free trade really reduce growth? Further testing using the economic freedom index (2005, background): “For example, even if there is a partial correlation between area 4 of the EFI and growth, the causality is unclear (cf. Dawson, 2003).”
- Foreign Aid and Market-Liberalizing Reform (2005, neutral): “3 While Dawson (2003) finds that this version of the Fraser index Granger-causes growth, he concludes that only two of the categories can be said to Granger-cause growth, one of the categories is jointly determined with growth, and another is Granger-caused by growth.”
- Economic Freedom and Productivity Growth in Resource-rich Economies (2015, background): “The link between economic freedom and economic growth receives a great deal of attention in the growth literature (see Carlsson & Lundström, 2002; Dawson, 2003; De Haan & Sturm, 2000; Heckelman, 2000; Justesen, 2008).”
- Panel evidence on economic freedom and growth in the United States (2011, background): “Using more advanced panel approaches, Dawson (2003) finds that the level of economic freedom, in general, Granger-causes economic growth while there is a bi-directional causal relationship between the change in economic freedom and economic growth.”
- Institutions, Latent Entrepreneurship, and Self–Employment: An International Comparison (2012, background): “Many studies using the EFW index find a positive relationship between economic freedom and economic growth (Berggren, 2003; Dawson, 2007) and causal effects from freedom to growth (Dawson, 2003; Farr, Lord, & Wolfenbarger, 1998; Gwartney, Lawson, & Holcombe, 1999).”
- The use (and abuse) of governance indicators in economics: a review (2008, background): “…have a time series component (data goes back in five-year intervals to 1970), and so causal inferences can potentially be made (see, for example, Dawson, 2003, and Farr et al, 1998).23 The Economic Freedom Index combines a number of categories purporting to measure different aspects of this…”
- Institutional infrastructure and economic growth in member countries of the Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC) (2015, background): “…is fundamental to achieving economic growth (see, inter alia, Acemoglu et al., 2001; Banerjee and Iyer, 2005; Carlsson and Lundstrom, 2002; Dawson, 1998, 2003; De Haan et al., 2006; Doucouliagos and Ulubasoglu, 2006; Fedderke, 2001; Gwartney et al., 2006; Hall and Ahmad, 2012; Hall and…”
- Government Size and Growth: A Survey and Interpretation of the Evidence (2011, neutral): “On the other hand, Dawson (2003) uses so-called Granger tests to assess the relationship, finding that the level of economic freedom, especially”