Ethylene is required in tobacco to successfully compete with proximate neighbours
By Ronald Pierik, E. Visser, Johan Kroon, Laurentius A. C. J. Voesenek. 2003
165 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/31e6aa10a07073978428356250eafff7a2771008
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Guillermo P. Murphy
- Susan A. Dudley
- Steven W. Kembel
- James F. Cahill Jr.
- Danny J. Gustafson
- M. V. Zanten
- T. Pons
- J. Janssen
Citations in the corpus
- On the Relevance and Control of Leaf Angle (2010, background): “Low quantities of ethylene triggered hyponasty in tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum) (Pierik et al., 2003).”
- Above‐ and below‐ground competition cues elicit independent responses (2007, background): “Blue light, light intensity and ethylene have been shown to serve as above-ground competition cues, or to interact with R : FR (Ballaré 1999; Pierik et al. 2003, 2004; Franklin & Whitelam 2005; Vandenbussche et al. 2005).”
- Root-emitted volatile organic compounds: can they mediate belowground plant-plant interactions? (2016, background): “…cues, it has been shown that tobacco plants must be able to perceive the phytohormone ethylene in order to develop a shadeavoidance phenotype (Pierik et al. 2003), and that barley plants allocated significantly more biomass to their roots when they were exposed to the volatiles emitted by…”
- Differential genetic influences on competitive effect and response in Arabidopsis thaliana (2005, background): “However, recent work with tobacco suggests an alternative explanation may be possible as well (Pierik et al. 2003).”