Direct regeneration of cathode materials from spent lithium iron phosphate batteries using a solid phase sintering method
By Song Xin, T. Hu, C. Liang, H. Long, Liqun Zhou, Wei-xiang Song, L. You, Z. Wu, Jianwen Liu. 2017
209 citations recorded by the source corpus.
A direct regeneration of cathode materials from spent LiFePO4 batteries using a solid phase sintering method has been proposed in this article. The spent battery is firstly dismantled to separate the cathode and anode plate, and then the cathode plate is soaked in DMAC organic solvent to separate the cathode materials and Al foil at optimal conditions of 30 min at 30 °C and solid liquid ratio of 1 : 20 g ml−1. XRD and SEM results of the spent LiFePO4 after separation show that there are some impurity phase components and irregular morphologies with many agglomerations. The spent materials are regenerated at appropriate temperatures with doping of new LiFePO4 at different ratios. Battery capacities from regenerated LiFePO4 can reach over 120 mA h g−1 at 0.1C discharge conditions, especially with the highest value of 144 mA h g−1 with a doping ratio of 3 : 7 at 700 °C. The rate capabilities and cycling performance of batteries made from regenerated LiFePO4 with doping at 600 °C and 700 °C are generally better than those at 800 °C. All the performances of batteries made from regenerated LiFePO4 with pure phase and uniform morphology can meet the basic requirements for reuse.
Subfields: Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Mechanical Engineering
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/31dfc857a4b141cf77660bbdf252a148fbfd750e
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Electrical and Electronic Engineering
In Mechanical Engineering
Citations in the corpus
- Current and future lithium-ion battery manufacturing (2021, background): “As the materials are not cycled, solid-state treatment could be the best option to recover the performance with minimum time and cost (Li et al., 2017; Song et al., 2017; Shi et al., 2018).”