D-Modules, Perverse Sheaves, and Representation Theory
By R. Hotta, K. Takeuchi, T. Tanisaki. 2007
604 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Computational Mechanics, Computational Theory and Mathematics, Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/31d5cdeadfefa7f2bac3496d093b98b9e415cbbf
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Computational Theory and Mathematics
Citations in the corpus
- Derived equivalence for quantum symplectic resolutions (2011, background): “2 of [35] (the proposition immediately generalizes to our setting).”
- Completions of symplectic reflection algebras (2010, background): “kly K×-equivariant DU0-module that is coherent as a OU0-module. Then there is an isomorphism M∼=OU0 ⊗ Fl(M) of DU0-modules. Proof. We remark that U0 is simply connected because codim U U\U0 >1. By [HHT], Corollary 5.3.10, it is enough to check that any weakly K×-equivariant D U0- module that is c”
- Symmetries and stabilization for sheaves of vanishing cycles (2012, background): “omplex analytic space X are sheaves of modules over a certain sheaf of rings of differential operators DX on X. Some books on them are Borel et al. [8], Coutinho [12], and Hotta, Takeuchi and Tanisaki [21] in the C-scheme case, and Bj¨ork [7] and Kashiwara [26] in the complex analytic case. For a sin”