Finite deformation pseudo-elasticity of shape memory alloys – Constitutive modelling and finite element implementation
By Stefanie Reese, D. Christ. 2008
180 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Materials Chemistry
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/31d1c950ff4c71149b78a354a59dd8db95988940
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Materials Chemistry
- Tarak Ben Zineb
- R. Naghdabadi
- J. Arghavani
- Cheikh Cissé
- W. Zaki
- Saeed Sohrabpour
- Darren J. Hartl
- Ferdinando Auricchio
Citations in the corpus
- Closed‐form matrix exponential and its application in finite‐strain plasticity (2014, background): “The exponential map integrators allow also a consistent treatment of volume changes in the finite deformation regime, for instance, in models of ductile damage [9], martensitic transformation in shape memory alloys [10, 11], and others.”
- Constitutive modeling and structural analysis considering simultaneous phase transformation and plastic yield in shape memory alloys (2009, background): “Further, linear FEA implementations of infinitesimal strain models result in non-physical solutions if large rotations exist, such as the homogeneous expansion of elements in the plane of rotation (for example, see [47], section 9.”
- A finite strain kinematic hardening constitutive model based on Hencky strain: General framework, solution algorithm and application to shape memory alloys (2011, methodology): “12 It has been defined in several works (Arghavani et al., 2010d; Reese and Christ, 2008; Christ and Reese, 2009; Helm and Haupt, 2003; Evangelista et al., 2009) as z ¼ kE ink eL , where eL is a material parameter related to the maximum transformation strain.”
- A robust model of pseudoelasticity in shape memory alloys (2013, unknown): “In other finitestrain models [15, 18, 19, 20, 21], an analogous constraint is imposed on the Green strain tensor, ‖E‖ ≤ εL, while the incompressibility constraint must be enforced separately.”
- A review of constitutive models and modeling techniques for shape memory alloys (2016, methodology): “Finite deformation and geometric non-linearity Constitutive models for SMAs with finite strain formulation (FSF) are needed to accurately simulate large structural rotations (Reese and Christ, 2008) and distortions (Ziolkowski, 2007).”
- A 3-D phenomenological constitutive model for shape memory alloys under multiaxial loadings (2010, methodology): “(27) which is more consistent with different papers in the literature, such as Souza et al. (1998), Auricchio and Petrini (2002), and Panico and Brinson (2007).”