On the Relationship Between Attitude Involvement and Attitude Accessibility: Toward a Cognitive-Motivational Model of Political Information Processing

By Howard G. Lavine, E. Borgida, J. Sullivan. 2000

137 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Explicating the Black Box Through Experimentation: Studies of Authoritarianism and Threat (2002, background): “However, as opinions become more cystallized and involving, challenges to their validity should be perceived as increasingly threatening (Lavine et al. 2000).”
Contemporary perspectives on the psychology of attitudes (2004, background): “…attitudes marked by evaluative conflict are held with less certainty and are more difficult to retrieve from memory (Huckfeldt & Sprague, 1998; Lavine et al., 2000), less stable over time (Lavine, 2001a; Zaller & Feldman, 1992), and more vulnerable to persuasion than relatively one-sided…”
Motivated Skepticism in the Evaluation of Political Beliefs (2006, background): “…process moments before any cognitive considerations, thereby signaling the affective coloration of the object (e.g., Bassili & Roy, 1998; Crites, Cacioppo, Gardner, & Berntson, 1995; Lavine, Thomsen, Zanna, & Borgida, 1998; Marcus, 1988; 2000; Rahn, 2000; Lodge & Taber, 2000, forthcoming).”