DNA barcoding for species identification and discovery in diatoms

84 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Data rich, information poor? Phytobenthos assessment and the Water Framework Directive (2013, background): “…purely on composition, future approaches will need to consider composition and new technologies such as DNA barcoding, which holds great promise (Mann et al., 2010; Zimmermann et al., 2011; Kermarrec et al., 2013) as a means of collecting basic information on composition with greater precision…”
Metabarcoding of lake benthic diatoms: from structure assemblages to ecological assessment (2018, background): “The incompleteness of reference libraries has already been shown to be one of the main limitation of metabarcoding in diatom identification for monitoring studies (Mann et al., 2010; Kermarrec et al., 2014; Zimmermann et al., 2015; Pawlowski et al., 2016; Rimet et al., 2016a, b).”
DNA-based species delimitation in algae (2014, background): “…al., 2002; Hoef-Emden, 2007, 2012 Diatoms rbcL cox1 SSU rDNA, LSU rDNA, rDNA ITS Amato et al., 2007; Evans et al., 2007; Vanelslander et al., 2009; Mann et al., 2010; Moniz & Kaczmarska, 2010; Hamsher et al., 2011; Kermarrec et al., 2013 Dinoflagellates psbAncr, 23S rDNA cox1, cob LSU rDNA, rDNA…”