Why Not Run the Efficient Global Optimization Algorithm with Multiple Surrogates
By Felipe Antonio Chegury Viana, Raphael T. Haftka, L. Watson. 2010
49 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Computational Theory and Mathematics, Management Science and Operations Research, Statistics and Probability
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/31c93bfa4d3ad8d36382bb2d20d5811892e5d353
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Computational Theory and Mathematics
- Martin Zaefferer
- Thomas Bartz-Beielstein
- Stefan Görtz
- Zhonghua Han
- Reza Alizadeh
- Farrokh Mistree
- Janet K. Allen
- Yaochu Jin
In Management Science and Operations Research
- Thomas Bartz-Beielstein
- Martin Zaefferer
- Zhonghua Han
- Reza Alizadeh
- Farrokh Mistree
- Janet K. Allen
- Stefan Görtz
- R. Matousek
In Statistics and Probability
- Stefan Görtz
- Zhonghua Han
- Thomas Bartz-Beielstein
- Reza Alizadeh
- Martin Zaefferer
- Farrokh Mistree
- Janet K. Allen
- R. Matousek
Citations in the corpus
- Model-based methods for continuous and discrete global optimization (2017, background): “Haftka [118] observe that an improved global accuracy of the surrogate is not necessary for obtaining the best result.”
- Managing computational complexity using surrogate models: a critical review (2020, methodology): “To address this problem, (Viana et al. 2010a, b, c) proposed an algorithm for adding several points per optimization cycle based on the simultaneous use of EOS.”
- Hierarchical Kriging Model for Variable-Fidelity Surrogate Modeling (2012, background): “In addition, for real applications, refinement by adding a single sample point per refinement cycle is inefficient; refinement by adding multiple sample points per cycle [41–43] is thus a subject of future research.”