The linear separability problem: some testing methods
By David A. Elizondo. 2006
125 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Statistical Learning Theory
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Artificial Intelligence
- Aäron van den Oord
- Sergey Levine
- Quoc V. Le
- Pieter Abbeel
- Trevor Darrell
- Andrew Zisserman
- Olivier J. H'enaff
- Jeffrey De Fauw
In Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
- Luc Van Gool
- Andrew Zisserman
- Trevor Darrell
- Dacheng Tao
- Jitendra Malik
- Ming-Hsuan Yang
- Andrea Vedaldi
- Xiaogang Wang
In Statistical Learning Theory
- S. M. Ali Eslami
- Ali Razavi
- Walter Senn
- Jean-Pascal Pfister
- Carl Doersch
- Johanni Brea
- Olivier J. H'enaff
- Jeffrey De Fauw
Citations in the corpus
- Data-Efficient Image Recognition with Contrastive Predictive Coding (2019, methodology): “Following prior work in self-supervised learning, we re-evaluated the CPC objective in terms of its ability to linearly separate image classes if given all the training labels, which is an informative metric given the connection between linear separability and classification complexity [18].”
- Matching Recall and Storage in Sequence Learning with Spiking Neural Networks (2013, methodology): “Linear separability, which is the criterion for learnability, was tested with the linear programming method provided by Mathematica (see (Elizondo, 2006) for details).”