Functional implications of cross-orientation inhibition of cortical visual cells. I. Neurophysiological evidence

By M. Morrone, D. Burr, L. Maffei. 1982

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

Two Distinct Mechanisms of Suppression in Human Vision (2005, background): “The other is “overlay suppression,” in which the mask is presented within the receptive field (superimposed on the test) and can have any orientation (Morrone et al., 1982; Bonds, 1989; DeAngelis et al., 1992; Carandini et al., 1997).”
Linearity and Normalization in Simple Cells of the Macaque Primary Visual Cortex (1997, background): “Indeed, the responses of a simple cell are often suppressed by superimposing stimuli with spatial frequencies and orientations that flank the preferred spatial frequency and orientation of the neuron (Movshon et al., 1978c; Morrone et al., 1982; De Valois and Tootell, 1983; De Valois et al., 1985; H”
Attentional modulation of visual processing. (2004, background): “…3C, which shows data recorded by Carandini et al. (1997) from a neuron in area V1 of the anesthetized macaque, when two spatially superimposed gratings, differing in orientation, appeared simultaneously within the receptive field (see also Bonds 1989, DeAngelis et al. 1992, Morrone et al. 1982).”
Modeling simple-cell direction selectivity with normalized, half-squared, linear operators. (1993, background): “There is, in fact, evidence that this is true (Bishop et al. 1973; Bonds 1989; DeValois and Tootell 1983; Morrone et al. 1982).”
Suppression without inhibition in visual cortex. (2002, background): “…et al., 1997) and from is given by our colleagues (Allison et al., 2001; Bauman and Bonds, 1991; Bonds, 1989; DeAngelis et al., 1992; Heeger, 1992; R(t) L1(t) L2(t) T n 1 (d1c1)n (d2c2)n , Morrone et al., 1982; Sengpiel et al., 1998, 1995; Sengpiel and Blakemore, 1994; Walker et al., 1998).”
Anatomical origins of the classical receptive field and modulatory surround field of single neurons in macaque visual cortical area V1. (2002, background): “This could generate interactions such as is seen with cross orientation inhibition, when orthogonally oriented stimuli overlap within the same RF and activity is reduced in neurons tuned to either orientation (Bishop et al., 1973; Morrone et al., 1982).”
Divisive normalization in olfactory population codes (2010, background): “For example, it was observed that in primary visual cortex, a neuron’s response to a grating with a preferred orientation can be suppressed by superimposing a nonpreferred orientation (Morrone et al., 1982).”
A Synaptic Explanation of Suppression in Visual Cortex (2002, background): “When measured with drifting gratings, however, suppression can be obtained with masks of any orientation (Morrone et al., 1982; Bonds, 1989; DeAngelis et al., 1992).”
Dynamics of Suppression in Macaque Primary Visual Cortex (2006, background): “…circuits, activated directly by feedforward signals from the LGN, by recurrent activation from nearby cortical neurons, or by feedback from extrastriate cortex (Burr et al., 1981; Morrone et al., 1982; Bonds, 1989; Heeger, 1992; Carandini et al., 1997; Allison et al., 2001; Lauritzen et al., 2001).”
Temporal properties of surround suppression in cat primary visual cortex (2007, background): “The first is observed by superimposing a mask onto the test, within the receptive field ~Morrone et al., 1982; Bonds, 1989; DeAngelis et al., 1992!.”
The Normalization Model of Attention (2009, methodology): “…is consistent with data in V1, for example, where the responses to an optimally oriented stimulus are diminished by superimposing an orthogonal stimulus, that is ineffective in driving the cell when presented alone (Bauman and Bonds, 1991; Bonds, 1989; Carandini et al., 1997; Morrone et al., 1982).”