Relationships between combination methods and measures of diversity in combining classifiers
By Catherine A. Shipp, Ludmila I. Kuncheva. Information Fusion, 2002
306 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Statistics and Probability
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/31aad5d4a4fb6d2f08364696f570e0dcd8a727ec
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Artificial Intelligence
- Gavin Brown
- Jeremy L. Wyatt
- Xin Yao
- Lior Rokach
- Yaochu Jin
- Ponnuthurai Nagaratnam Suganthan
- Carlos Artemio Coello Coello
- Efrén Mezura-Montes
In Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
In Statistics and Probability
Citations in the corpus
- Ensemble Learning (2019, unknown): “Ulaş et al. (2009) discuss two approaches to incrementally constructing an ensemble.”
- A survey of multiple classifier systems as hybrid systems (2014, unknown): “Non-pairwise diversity measures comparing outputs of a given classifier and the entire ensemble, such as Kohavi–Wolpert variance [66], a measure of inter-rater (inter-classifier) reliability [67], the entropy measure [68], the measure of difficulty [8], generalized diversity [52], and coincident fai”
- Diversity creation methods: a survey and categorisation (2004, background): “In a summary paper of her own work, Kuncheva states: ‘‘although a rough tendency was confirmed. . . no prominent links appeared between the diversity of the ensemble and its accuracy.”