The Kyoto Protocol: Regional and Sectoral Contributions to the Carbon Leakage

By S. Paltsev. 2001

211 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/318ecf335875d391feb64091ef727e3d03f86d78

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

1. T. Wiedmann
2. Manfred Lenzen
3. J. Barrett
4. Richard Wood
5. Edgar G. Hertwich
6. G. P. Peters
7. K. Turner
8. J. Bergh

In Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment

1. Richard Wood
2. Manfred Lenzen
3. J. Barrett
4. T. Wiedmann
5. Edgar G. Hertwich
6. G. P. Peters
7. J. Bergh
8. K. Turner

Citations in the corpus

• Carbon Leakage, the Green Paradox and Perfect Future Markets (2011, unknown): “Bohm (1993), Felder and Rutherford (1993), Hoel (1996), Paltsev (2001), Babiker (2005), Copeland and Taylor (2005), Ishikawa and Kiyono (2006), Gerlagh and Kuik (2007), Ishikawa and Okubo (2008), Marschinski et al. (2008) and others provide further informative insights into various channels and…”
• Trade Liberalization and Carbon Leakage (2003, methodology): “Bollen et al. (2000) and Paltsev (2001) confirm these results, but Burniaux and Oliveira-Martins (1999) find, in contrast, that the rate of carbon leakage is rather insensitive to the size of trade elasticities.”
• Environmental Impacts of Capital Formation (2018, background): “This so-called carbon leakage is discussed in several articles (Peters and Hertwich 2008a, 2008b; Babiker 2005; Paltsev 2001).”
• Energy Conservation More Effective With Rebound Policy (2011, background): “…countries with less stringent environmental regulation) and associated changes in foreign trade flows cause initial, direct reductions in GHG emissions to be compensated by increases in GHG emissions elsewhere (Felder and Rutherford 1993; Babiker 2001; Paltsev 2001; Kuik and Gerlagh 2003).”
• Embodied Carbon Tariffs (2011, unknown): “In practice, the policy debate focuses on the use of import tariffs since export rebates may constitute a subsidy under the WTO's Agreement on Subsidies and Countervailing Measures (Cosbey, Droge, Fischer, Reinaud, Stephenson, Weischer and Wooders 2012).”
• Examining the global environmental impact of regional consumption activities — Part 2: Review of input–output models for the assessment of environmental impacts embodied in trade (2007, background): “This is confirmed by Paltsev (2001) who finds that not regional sector aggregation but “fossil fuel supply elasticities and trade substitution elasticities are the crucial determinants” in his static, multi-regional GE model of the carbon leakage resulting from the Kyoto protocol.”
• On the empirical content of carbon leakage criteria in the EU emissions trading scheme (2014, background): “Models with exogenous technical change predict carbon leakage rates between 5 and 35% for the Kyoto Protocol commitments (Paltsev, 2001).”
• Border adjustment for European emissions trading: Competitiveness and carbon leakage (2010, background): “Most CGE analyses emphasize the effect of climate policies on world demand for primary fuels (mainly oil and coal) that is likely to partially shift from regulated to nonregulated countries (Kuik and Gerlagh, 2003; Paltsev, 2001).”
• Imperfect Environmental Policy and Polluting Emissions: The Green Paradox and Beyond (2012, background): “Paltsev (2001) and Burniaux and Oliveira Martins (2012) fail to find a green paradox for very high values of the Armington elasticities.”
• An Expanded Three-Part Architecture for Post-2012 International Climate Policy (2009, unknown): “Estimates from computable general equilibrium models of potential carbon leakage rates under a global climate regime range from 5 percent to 34 percent (Paltsev 2001).”
• The Global Effects of Subglobal Climate Policies (2010, background): “For individual sectors, however, calculated leakage rates can be much higher than the average leakage rates (Paltsev 2001; Fischer and Fox 2009; Ho et al. 2008).”
• Carbon leakage from unilateral Environmental Tax Reforms in Europe, 1995–2005 (2007, methodology): “Paltsev (2001) uses a static global equilibrium model GTAP-EG based on 1995 data to analyse the effects of the 1997 proposed Kyoto Protocol.”