Comment on "Evidence for Neutrinoless Double Beta Decay"

By C. Aalseth, F. Avignone, A. Barabash, F. Boehm, R. Brodzinski, J. Collar, P. Doe, H. Ejiri, H. Ejiri, S. Elliott and 17 more. 2002

173 citations recorded by the source corpus.

We comment on the recent claim for the experimental observation of neutrinoless double-beta decay. We discuss several limitations in the analysis provided in that paper and conclude that there is no basis for the presented claim.

Subfields: Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Radiation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/318d26a64acaeba6e9d504ba50f1413c9de2fb03

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Nuclear and High Energy Physics

1. Jonathan Engel
2. S. Elliott
3. F. Avignone

In Radiation

1. Jonathan Engel
2. S. Elliott
3. F. Avignone

Citations in the corpus

• Sensitivity and discovery potential of the proposed nEXO experiment to neutrinoless double- β decay (2017, unknown): “ration detectors are currently under development and construction and will begin data taking over the next few years. Evidence of 0νββ in 76Ge has been reported [9, 10, 11] but has yet to be confirmed [12, 13, 14, 15], and recent experimental results are in conflict with the claim [16]. TheCryogenicUn”
• Neutrinoless Double Beta Decay: 2015 Review (2016, unknown): “, [24, 130, 208, 209]).”
• Double Beta Decay, Majorana Neutrinos, and Neutrino Mass (2007, background): “The cryostats will be electroformed as in the case of the IGEX cryostats.”