Assessing the (Un)Trustworthiness of Saliency Maps for Localizing Abnormalities in Medical Imaging

By N. Arun, N. Gaw, P. Singh, K. Chang, M. Aggarwal, B. Chen, K. Hoebel, S. Gupta, J. Patel, M. Gidwani and 3 more. 2020

115 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Saliency maps have become a widely used method to make deep learning models more interpretable by providing post-hoc explanations of classifiers through identification of the most pertinent areas of the input medical image. They are increasingly being used in medical imaging to provide clinically plausible explanations for the decisions the neural network makes. However, the utility and robustness of these visualization maps has not yet been rigorously examined in the context of medical imaging. We posit that trustworthiness in this context requires 1) localization utility, 2) sensitivity to model weight randomization, 3) repeatability, and 4) reproducibility. Using the localization information available in two large public radiology datasets, we quantify the performance of eight commonly used saliency map approaches for the above criteria using area under the precision-recall curves (AUPRC) and structural similarity index (SSIM), comparing their performance to various baseline measures. Using our framework to quantify the trustworthiness of saliency maps, we show that all eight saliency map techniques fail at least one of the criteria and are, in most cases, less trustworthy when compared to the baselines. We suggest that their usage in the high-risk domain of medical imaging warrants additional scrutiny and recommend that detection or segmentation models be used if localization is the desired output of the network.

Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Health Informatics, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Artificial Intelligence

  1. Joseph D. Janizek
  2. Su-In Lee
  3. Alex J. DeGrave
  4. Ahmed Bouridane
  5. Ahmad Chaddad
  6. Jihao Peng
  7. Jian Xu
  8. Scott M. Lundberg

In Health Informatics

  1. Ahmed Bouridane
  2. Ahmad Chaddad
  3. Su-In Lee
  4. Jihao Peng
  5. Jian Xu

In Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging

  1. Su-In Lee
  2. Alex J. DeGrave
  3. Joseph D. Janizek

Citations in the corpus