Flow structures and drag characteristics of a colony-type emergent roughness model mounted on a flat plate in uniform flow

By Takeshi Takemura, N. Tanaka. 2007

155 citations recorded by the source corpus.

The characteristics of flow structures around a colony-type emergent roughness model, hereafter called ‘colony model’, mounted on a flat plate in uniform flow and the drag coefficient Cdc for the colony model are investigated by flow visualization, spectral analysis, velocity measurement and drag force measurement. Two types of colony models, each comprising seven equally spaced cylinders with grid or staggered arrangement are mounted on a water flume bed. The flow structure around the colony model changes depending on L/D and G/D (L: space between neighboring cylinders, D: diameter of a cylinder, G: space between cylinders in the cross-stream direction). Two types of flow structures, a large-scale Kármán vortex street (LKV) behind the colony models and a primitive Kármán vortex street (PKV) behind the individual cylinders, are generated. LKV is formed along the shear layer for G/D < 0.4. When G/D > 1.8, PKV behind each cylinder is stably formed because of the decrease in difference between the velocity through the colony model and that of the detour flow. The velocity through the colony model, which plays a key role for the phenomenon change, strongly increases with G/D at first and then gradually. The tendency of the velocity curve changes around G/D = 1.8 for each arrangement. It almost coincides with the initiation of the formation of PKV. On the other hand, Cdc for the colony model increases in the range of 0.08 < G/D < 0.75 (0.25 < L/D < 1) and 0 <G/D < 1 (1 < L/D < 3) for the grid and staggered arrangements, respectively. The changing point of the tendency in the Cdc curve is located in the middle of the transition zone for the two vortex structures (0.4 < G/D < 1.8). Moreover, the Cdc value for the colony model is nearly constant, independent of the two arrangements, when G/D > 1.8.

Subfields: Computational Mechanics, Earth-Surface Processes, Ecology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/317252f7cfd59f2e1ea19484f0e5bd50d2333e57

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Computational Mechanics

  1. A. Ortiz
  2. Zhengbing Chen
  3. H. Nepf
  4. Thorsten Stoesser
  5. Lijun Zong

In Earth-Surface Processes

  1. Lijun Zong
  2. A. Ortiz
  3. Zhengbing Chen
  4. H. Nepf
  5. Thorsten Stoesser

In Ecology

  1. Lijun Zong
  2. A. Ortiz
  3. Zhengbing Chen
  4. H. Nepf
  5. Thorsten Stoesser

Citations in the corpus