Household energy preferences for cooking in urban Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso

306 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Dispelling common misconceptions to improve attitudes and policy outlook on charcoal in developing countries (2013, background): “Studies on energy consumption trends, however, consistently demonstrate that the poor — in particular the ‘poor of the poor’ cannot afford charcoal (e.g., Karakezi et al., 2008; Nansaior et al., 2011; Ouedraogo, 2006).”
Determinants of household energy use in Bhutan (2014, background): “The result confirms and supports the energy ladder hypothesis [3,8,9,21].”
AN EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS OF HOUSEHOLD ENERGY CHOICE IN GHANA (2015, methodology): “average representing the real proportions of choices (Ouedraogo, 2006).”
Stacking up the ladder: A panel data analysis of Tanzanian household energy choices (2017, background): “In the fuel-choice literature, numerous authors have adopted a pooled multinomial logit approach to model fuel choices (Heltberg, 2005; Ouedraogo, 2006; Pundo and Fraser, 2006).”
Modeling household cooking fuel choice: A panel multinomial logit approach (2015, background): “Similarly, Ouedraogo (2006) finds that wood energy remains the preferred fuel of most urban households of Burkina Faso.”