Do EU structural funds promote regional growth? New evidence from various panel data approaches☆
By P. Mohl, Tobias Hagen. 2010
365 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Political Science and International Relations
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/315fab6a5c27756f113cc1f87b1b0923b50886f6
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Economics and Econometrics
- U. Fratesi
- Giovanni Perucca
- M. V. Ehrlich
- Julia Bachtrögler
- Henry G. Overman
- Lars Mewes
- Peter H. Egger
- Marco Percoco
In Political Science and International Relations
- Henry G. Overman
- M. V. Ehrlich
- U. Fratesi
- Giovanni Perucca
- Julia Bachtrögler
- Lars Mewes
- Marco Percoco
- Peter H. Egger
Citations in the corpus
- The impact of European Cohesion Policy in urban and rural regions (2017, background): “Mohl and Hagen (2010) found a small but positive impact of Objective 1 grants on regional growth and no effect or even negative effects of Objective 2 and 3 payments.”
- Place-Based Policies and Spatial Disparities across European Cities (2020, positive): “On average, transfers appear to have been effective in fostering growth in recipients and thus reducing disparities (Becker, Egger, Ehrlich 2010; Mohl and Hagen 2010; Pellegrini et al. 2013; Giua 2017).”
- Meta-analysis of the impact of European Union Structural Funds on regional growth (2017, background): “The more recent studies in the database have dealt with this issue by using past levels of Structural Funds (such as Mohl & Hagen, 2010), instrumental variables (such as Dall’Erba & Le Gallo, 2008) or Arellano and Bond’s (1991) estimator (Esposti & Bussoletti, 2008).”
- Measuring the effects of European Regional Policy on economic growth: A regression discontinuity approach (2013, background): “While some econometric analyses suggest that Regional policy has a significant positive impact on growth and convergence (de la Fuente and Vives, 1995; Cappelen et al., 2003; Beugelsdijk and Eijffinger, 2005; Mohl and Hagen, 2010), others find only conditionally”
- The influence of the local context on the implementation and impact of EU Cohesion Policy (2019, result): “Regarding the second dimension of heterogeneity, some studies (e.g., Cappelen, Castellacci, Fagerberg, & Verspagen, 2003; Mohl & Hagen, 2010) define the local conditions assumed to affect the impact of CP in general terms, for example, as the overall regional level of 22 Julia Bachtrögler et…”
- Efforts to Implement Smart Specialization in Practice—Leading Unlike Horses to the Water (2015, background): “…became increasingly acutely aware that structural funding not only failed to reach its stated aim of increasing cohesion at the macro level (Mohl & Hagen, 2010) but at the micro level also gave plentiful evidence of ill-informed and less-than-strategic investment decisions (Technopolis et…”
- Effects of EU Regional Policy: 1989-2013 (2017, background): “We refer the interested reader to Mohl and Hagen (2010) whose Table 1 nicely summa-”
- Technological complexity and economic growth of regions (2020, methodology): “In the definition of spatial weights, we followed existing approaches in the literature (Mohl and Hagen, 2010) and defined the weights matrix W based on a k-nearest neighbors approach, with”