Predicting Support for Welfare Policies: The Impact of Attributions and Beliefs About Inequality

By Heather E. Bullock, W. Williams, Wendy Limbert. 2003

223 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Gender Studies, Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/315a5948feabdcf7122568afa5f5c8cd4b317025

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Gender Studies

1. Donald P. Green
2. H. Kern
3. Michael W. Kraus
4. Dacher Keltner
5. Kevin Munger

In Political Science and International Relations

1. Donald P. Green
2. H. Kern
3. Michael W. Kraus
4. Dacher Keltner
5. Paul K. Piff
6. James H. Fowler

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Michael W. Kraus
2. Dacher Keltner
3. Paul K. Piff
4. Donald P. Green
5. H. Kern
6. Stéphane Côté
7. A. S. R. Manstead
8. Cameron Anderson

Citations in the corpus

• Modeling heterogeneous treatment effects in large-scale experiments using Bayesian Additive Regression Trees (2010, methodology): “We offer two examples rather than one in order to emphasize the fact that BART provides an appropriately cautious approach to the estimation of CATEs.”
• Unpacking the inequality paradox: The psychological roots of inequality and social class. (2018, background): “…attributions for poverty and wealth are, in turn, associated with beliefs that economic inequality arises because of differences in ability and talent, reduced support for wealth redistribution, and greater endorsement of restrictive welfare policies (Bullock et al., 2003; Kluegel & Smith, 1986).”