Report of the Tevatron Higgs working group

By M. Carena, J. Conway, H. Haber, J. Hobbs, B. Harris, S. Kuhlmann, Z. Sullivan, T. Tait, C. Wagner. 2000

215 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Electroweak radiative corrections to associated WH and ZH production at hadron colliders (2003, background): “on with W or Z bosons, pp¯→ WH +X and pp¯→ ZH +X, (1.1) is the most promising discovery channel for a SM Higgs particle with a mass below about 135 GeV, where decays into b¯b ﬁnal states are dominant [4]. At leading order, the production of a Higgs boson in association with a vector boson, pp¯→ VH +”
Higgs production in hadron collisions: soft and virtual QCD corrections at NNLO (2001, methodology): “Inclusive production of Higgs boson through gluon–gluon fusion is phenomenologically less relevant at the Tevatron: it is not regarded as a main discovery channel, because of the large QCD background [6]. The paper is organized as follows. In Sect. 2 we deﬁne the soft-virtual approximation for the c”
Higgs-Boson production in association with a single bottom quark (2002, methodology): “DEAC02-76CH03000 and DE-FG02-91ER40677.”
Suggestions for benchmark scenarios for MSSM Higgs boson searches at hadron colliders (2002, methodology): “Besides the mmaxh scenario, which has been used to obtain conservative bounds on tan β [8], and the no-mixing scenario, the large-µ scenario had been designed to encourage the investigation of flavor and decay-mode independent decay channels (instead of focusing on the h → bb̄ channel).”