Biotechnology - the Making of a Global Controversy
By M. Bauer, G. Gaskell. 2002
329 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/311145510dd96a9f41a7914466a9107dbb2c21ee
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- R. Gifford
- S. Clayton
- T. Doherty
- Janet K. Swim
- I. brunton-smith
- Patrick Sturgis
- Dimitra Tabourazi
- Tobin N. Walton
Citations in the corpus
- Science knowledge and attitudes across cultures: a meta-analysis (2008, background): “…research suggests, firstly, that there is indeed variation in the strength of this correlation across European countries and, secondly, that this variation can be explained by differences in national or regional socioeconomic conditions (Allum et al., 2002; Bauer et al., 1994; Durant et al., 2000).”
- General Beliefs and Environmental Concern (2006, methodology): “Following earlier research, we clustered the respondents according to their general beliefs by using a combination of indicators of general beliefs (cf. Bennulf, 1994; Hviid Nielsen et al., 2002).”
- Psychology and Global Climate Change: Addressing a Multi-faceted Phenomenon and Set of Challenges A Report by the American Psychological Association's Task Force on the Interface Between Psychology and Global Climate Change Members (2009, background): “…processes are three theoretical frameworks describing the complex factors which mediate and substantially influence the public’s appraisals of risk, environmental threat, and global environmental change (e.g., Bauer & Gaskell, 2002; Flynn, Slovic & Kunreuther, 2001; Pidgeon et al., 2003).”
- The Rehabilitation of Common Sense: Social Representations, Science and Cognitive Polyphasia (2008, unknown): “This is clearly the case in Bauer and Gaskell’s research on biotechnology in the public sphere (Bauer and Gaskell, 2002; Gaskel and Bauer, 2001) which constitutes a comprehensive theoretical and empirical examination of how common sense resists, reframes and eventually reconstitutes science,…”