Quantification of YouTube QoE via Crowdsourcing

By Tobias Hossfeld, Michael Seufert, Matthias Hirth, Thomas Zinner, Phuoc Tran-Gia, R. Schatz. IEEE International Symposium on Multimedia, 2011

383 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

A web based subjective evaluation platform (2013, result): “In contrast to the well-known laboratory experiments where the experiment is conducted in a controlled environment, crowdsourced experiments are not controlled and, thus, may result in cheating, unintended environment, no possibility to ask questions, etc. [3].”
A Survey on Quality of Experience of HTTP Adaptive Streaming (2015, positive): “The authors of [4] present a model for mapping regular stalling patterns to MOS.”
Robustness in speech quality assessment and temporal training expiry in mobile crowdsourcing environments (2015, result): “Focusing on quality assessment of an online video service, [9] compares results from two laboratory studies and different crowdsourcing studies.”
Effect of trapping questions on the reliability of speech quality judgments in a crowdsourcing paradigm (2015, methodology): “In the context of QoE, researchers have used additional methods like content questions and consistency tests [9], [10].”