Logics of Conversation

By Nicholas Asher, Alex Lascarides. Studies in natural language processing, 2005

1,775 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/30e36a103258d18c6c7ca9570b405bd738266a55

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

A PDTB-styled end-to-end discourse parser (2012, background): “…for Discourse (D-LTAG) by Webber and Joshi (1998), Forbes et al. (2003), and Webber (2004), the Segmented Discourse Representation Theory (SDRT) by Asher and Lascarides (2003), which provides a logically precise dynamic semantic interpretation, and the discourse model that associates discourse…”
Prerequisite Skills for Reading Comprehension: Multi-Perspective Analysis of MCTest Datasets and Systems (2017, unknown): “Such an inference is similar to bridging (Asher and Lascarides 2003), which is implicitly performed using some commonsense knowledge.”
Discourse Representation Structure Parsing (2018, methodology): “To account for the rhetorical structure of texts, GMB adopts Segmented Discourse Representation Theory (SDRT; Asher and Lascarides 2003).”
What is a perfect state? (2010, methodology): “We assume the correctness of this hypothesis and discuss the role the perfect plays in enhancing discourse coherence in the context of the approach to discourse coherence proposed in SEGMENTED DISCOURSE REPRESENTATION THEORY (SDRT) (Asher & Lascarides 2003).”
Situated Dialogue and Spatial Organization: What, Where… and Why? (2007, methodology): “After the utterance is related to the preceding context in this way, an updated model of the dialogue context is obtained in the sense of e.g. (Asher & Lascarides, 2003) and (Bos et al., 2003).”
Parsing Argumentation Structures in Persuasive Essays (2016, background): “urse structures such as deﬁned by rhetorical structure theory (RST) (Mann and Thompson 1987), Penn discourse treebank (PDTB) (Prasad et al. 2008), or segmented discourse representation theory (SDRT) (Asher and Lascarides 2003). The internal structure of an argument consists of several argument Ubiqu”
Coordination of Causal Relations in Discourse. (2005, unknown): “It’s commonly accepted, as in (Knott, 1996) for instance, that all the French or English discourses in (1) involve a discourse relation, namely Explanation , a description of which can be found in SDRT (Segmented Discourse Representation Theory), (Asher & Lascarides, 2003).”
Book Reviews: The Proper Treatment of Events, by Michiel van Lambalgen and Fritz Hamm (2005, background): “Kamp and Rohrer’s unfortunately unpublished [59]) or extensions thereof such as SDRT (for which see for example [27] and [4]).”
Coreference and discourse coherence in L2: The roles of grammatical aspect and referential form (2017, background): “These different continuation types establish different coherence relations, i.e., the relationships between propositions that must be inferred in order for a discourse to make sense (Asher & Lascarides, 2003; Hobbs, 1979; Kehler, 2002; Mann & Thompson, 1988).”
Sentic patterns: Dependency-based rules for concept-level sentiment analysis (2014, background): “Insome cases, a sentence is composed of more than one elementary discourse unit (in the sense of Asher & Lascarides [50]).”