Politeness in Chinese Face-to-Face Interaction

By Yuling Pan. 2000

175 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/30ce845ed1a42383fdb156d80846b52a9d1d1bbb

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

1. Michael Haugh
2. D. Kádár
3. Helen Spencer-Oatey
4. J. Culpeper
5. Alfred Presbitero
6. D. Archer

Citations in the corpus

• Epilogue: The first-second order distinction in face and politeness research (2012, background): “…in Chinese culture”, the real “key force in Chinese social interaction is along the ‘outsider-insider’ continuum, pulling the relationship between the interactants towards the central figure” (Ye 2004: 227), the importance of which has also been noted by others (Pan 2000; Pan and Kádár 2011).”
• The bases of (im)politeness evaluations : culture, the moral order and the East–West debate (2015, background): “The terms emic and etic were first coined in the 1950s by the descriptive linguist Kenneth Pike (1967), drawing on the distinction between phonetics and phonemics.”