Measurement of neutrino oscillation with KamLAND: evidence of spectral distortion.

By T. Araki, K. Eguchi, S. Enomoto, K. Furuno, K. Ichimura, H. Ikeda, K. Inoue, K. Ishihara, T. Iwamoto, T. Kawashima and 83 more. Physical Review Letters, 2004

933 citations recorded by the source corpus.

We present results of a study of neutrino oscillation based on a 766 ton/year exposure of KamLAND to reactor antineutrinos. We observe 258 nu (e) candidate events with energies above 3.4 MeV compared to 365.2+/-23.7 events expected in the absence of neutrino oscillation. Accounting for 17.8+/-7.3 expected background events, the statistical significance for reactor nu (e) disappearance is 99.998%. The observed energy spectrum disagrees with the expected spectral shape in the absence of neutrino oscillation at 99.6% significance and prefers the distortion expected from nu (e) oscillation effects. A two-neutrino oscillation analysis of the KamLAND data gives Deltam(2)=7.9(+0.6)(-0.5)x10(-5) eV(2). A global analysis of data from KamLAND and solar-neutrino experiments yields Deltam(2)=7.9(+0.6)(-0.5)x10(-5) eV(2) and tan((2)theta=0.40(+0.10)(-0.07), the most precise determination to date.

Subfields: Nuclear and High Energy Physics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/30cb75e7f3c1d9b32afd5e41f4ab6b07c179afae

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Nuclear and High Energy Physics

  1. M. Tórtola
  2. M. Maltoni
  3. T. Schwetz
  4. S. Basu
  5. A. Serenelli
  6. J. Valle
  7. S. Hannestad
  8. M. Gonzalez-Garcia

Citations in the corpus