Microsatellite (SSR) variation in a collection of Malus (apple) species and hybrids
By S. Hokanson, W. Lamboy, A. Szewc-McFadden, James McFerson. Euphytica, 2001
168 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Environmental Chemistry, Plant Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/30bf1567e11179e49679dea02c44c0075e56cf26
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
In Environmental Chemistry
In Plant Science
Citations in the corpus
- Microsatellite genotyping of apple (Malus × domestica Borkh.) genetic resources in the Netherlands: application in collection management and variety identification (2010, background): “be highly polymorphic and, thus, have proven to be a powerful marker system for diversity studies (Hokanson et al. 2001; Coart et al. 2003; Gharghani et al. 2009) and for variety discrimination (Guilford et al.”
- Cultivar identification and genetic fingerprinting of temperate fruit tree species using DNA markers (2002, background): “In a recent work (Hokanson et al., 2001) analysed 142 accessions of 23 Malus species, hybrids and cultivars with the eight previously developed SSR primers.”
- Microsatellite markers spanning the apple (Malus x domestica Borkh.) genome (2006, result): “…and profiles may be the reason why most GD–SSRs could not be mapped by us because of very complex band patterns that rendered impossible the recognition of the SSR alleles, despite giving good results in other studies (Hokanson et al. 1998, 2001; Hemmat et al. 2003; Van de Weg, unpublished).”
- Importance of Genetic Diversity Assessment in Crop Plants and Its Recent Advances: An Overview of Its Analytical Perspectives (2015, background): “If food production levels decreases over the year, there will be huge pressure to cultivate the crops under marginal lands or implement unsustainable practices that, over the long-term, degrade lands and resources and adversely impact biodiversity on and near agricultural areas.”
- Genetic diversity and structure of local apple cultivars from Northeastern Spain assessed by microsatellite markers (2012, background): “The genetic base of the domesticated apple has been eroded dramatically in the last centuries (Hokanson et al. 2001), as most cultivars bred during the twentieth century were obtained from a reduced number of progenitor lineages and, therefore, share a high degree of identity (Noiton and Alspach…”
- Genetic diversity and population structure in Malus sieversii, a wild progenitor species of domesticated apple (2009, background): “Not surprisingly, higher levels of gene diversity were found by Hokanson et al. (2001) when 142 accessions representing a broad spectrum of 23 species and hybrids were analyzed using the same microsatellite markers.”
- Genetic diversity and similarity of pear (Pyrus L.) cultivars native to East Asia revealed by SSR (simple sequence repeat) markers (2007, background): “In this study, observed heterozygosities (Ho) for individual loci ranged from 0.39 for KU10 to 0.97 for NH015a, with an average value of 0.63, which is equal to the value of a previous study in 60 Pyrus accessions (Kimura et al. 2002) and is comparable with a value of 0.62 ( Hokanson et al. 2001 )—0”
- Genetic Diversity, Population Structure and Construction of a Core Collection of Apple Cultivars from Italian Germplasm (2014, background): “, ‘Red Delicious’, ‘Golden Delicious’ and ‘Jonathan’) have been extensively used in apple breeding to select new varieties with desirable traits, but, as a consequence, the genetic base of the species was narrowed (Hokanson et al. 2001; Noiton and Alspach 1996).”
- Genetic Diversity, Population Structure, Parentage Analysis, and Construction of Core Collections in the French Apple Germplasm Based on SSR Markers (2016, background): “Numerous diversity studies have been performed on apple germplasm (Garkava-Gustavsson et al. 2008; Gasi et al. 2010; Gross et al. 2014; Hokanson et al. 2001; Liang et al. 2015; Moriya et al. 2011; Pereira-Lorenzo et al. 2008; Song et al. 2006; Urrestarazu et al. 2012; van Treuren et al. 2010) but as”