Offshoring, Foreign Direct Investment, and the Structure of U.S. Trade

By S. Yeaple. 2006

175 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/30b887c464fe94c647fa277da49d8325fff961d1

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

In Strategy and Management

Citations in the corpus

Intrafirm trade and vertical fragmentation in U.S. multinational corporations (2015, unknown): “Carr et al. (2001), Antras (2003), Yeaple (2006), Nunn and Treﬂer (2008), Bernard et al. (2009), and Costinot et al. (2011) analyze intra-MNC trade using data aggregated to the country-industry level.”
Offshoring and the Role of Trade Agreements (2012, background): “The recent empirical studies of Feenstra and Hanson (2005), Yeaple (2006), Levchenko (2007), Nunn (2007), and Nunn and Tre er (2008) substantiate the empirical relevance of these non-standard features of o¤shoring.”
Outsourcing versus integration at home or abroad and firm heterogeneity (2010, unknown): “Yeaple (2006) finds that intra-firm U.S. imports from the least developed or emerging countries are positively correlated with capital intensity, while imports from advanced countries are positively correlated with R&D intensity.”
Adaptation and the Boundary of Multinational Firms (2011, methodology): “2 Recent empirical tests of the property rights model of the multinational include Feenstra and Hanson (2005), Yeaple (2006), Defever and Toubal (2007), Tomiura (2007), Bernard et al. (2008), Carluccio and Fally (2008), and Nunn and Trefler (2008).”
Global Sourcing of Complex Production Processes (2014, result): “The studies by Feenstra and Hanson (2005), Yeaple (2006), Marin (2006), and Federico (2010), among others, are also concerned with the internal structure of MNEs and obtain empirical ndings broadly in line with those baseline models.”
Is there a trend towards global value chain specialization? — An examination of cross border sales of US foreign affiliates (2009, unknown): “activities’) and R&D, have emerged (Nachum and Zaheer, 2005; Ramamurti, 2004; Grossman and Helpman, 2005; Antras et al. 2006; Yeaple, 2006) - often referred to as the second and third wave of offshoring, respectively (McKinsey Global Institute, 2007; Farell, 2004, 2006; Engardio”
Contractual Frictions and Global Sourcing (2006, background): “…in the contractibility of an input provided by the final-good producer encourage outsourcing while improvements in the contractibility of 7Using data on the activities of U.S. multinational firms, Yeaple (2006) presents evidence supporting some salient cross-industry implications of our model.”
Intra-Firm Trade and Product Contractibility (Long Version) (2010, unknown): “In Antràs (2003), capital intensity captures the relative importance of headquarters’ investments, and hence we include industry capital intensity and country capital abundance. To allow for the possibility that other factor intensities matter, we also include industry skill intensity and country sk”
Organizations and Trade (2009, background): “Recent e¤orts have been directed towards the development of empirical tests of the property-rights model of the multinational rm, as exempli ed by Feenstra and Hanson (2005), Yeaple (2006), Defever and Toubal (2007), Tomiura (2007), Bernard et al. (2008) and Nunn and Tre er (2008).”
Producer Services, Manufacturing Linkages, and Trade (2008, background): “Recent literature along these lines includes Amiti and Wei (2005), Feenstra and Hanson (1996, 1999), Francois et al. (2004), Javorcik (2004), Markusen (2005), Markusen and Venables (1997), and Yeaple (2006).”
The Empirics of Firm Heterogeneity and International Trade (2012, background): “…of law (as a proxy for the quality of foreign property rights).19 Additional empirical support for the above theoretical predictions is provided by Yeaple (2006), which uses Bureau of Economic Analysis (BEA) data on the value of imports by U.S. parent rms from their foreign a liates as a measure…”